Crazyguy 40 minutes ago
"Let's be clear lurkers need the truth as much as anybody so for one the proper translation is not 'end of the world' but 'end of the age'."
Not sure who you're talking to?
That point was already made in my OP:
..the disciples supposing that when the destruction of Jerusalem should take place, then would be the coming of Christ and the end of the world.. or, the conclusion of the age, as συντελεια του αιωνος should rather be translated here, and often signifies.
http://biblehub.com/commentaries/matthew/24-3.htm
The rest of your post is basically off-topic, about the Bible being untrustworthy, which is obvious to us.. but a JW won't listen, they believe Gods spirit told the writers what was said and preserved Gods word intact. That kind of talk will not get through to a Jehovah's Witness, and that was the whole point of my starting this thread. It was most likely a waste of time I guess..
There must be a million threads on here about the Bible not being divinely inspired and trustworthy.I was attempting to provide people with a step-by-step reasoning process to use with JW's, using just the Bible and possibly some of the Bible commentary from the article.. that would move any thoughtful JW to acknowledge that absolutely nothing in the text ITSELF indicates Jesus was talking about a generation nearly 2000 years later...
The Bible does not in any way support that conclusion (if you read it for yourself without a need to make it say something it does not).That should be enough to debunk the Governing Body's claims that only they are authorised to interpret the Bible correctly.They apparently refuse to even study the Bible without bias or their own agenda.
Searcher:
(Luke 21:20) “However, when you see Jerusalem surrounded by encamped armies, then know that the desolating of her has drawn near."
Pretty specific and unparalleled in that generation's personal experience!
Great point. It is so simple when you read the text in an unbiased way, isn't it?